Home
Rose Bowl
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends]

Below are the 6 most recent journal entries recorded in rbowliowa's LiveJournal:

    Friday, August 18th, 2006
    12:05 pm
    USC May Be Spoiler in NFL Coliseum Plan
    Michael A. Hiltzik
    Los Angeles Times

    Before the National Football League can take over the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum in preparation for its return to the region, its most serious obstacle may well be USC's football program.

    The collegiate powerhouse has made the Coliseum its home for 83 years. And since the departure of the Raiders in 1994, USC football has basked in its stature as the Coliseum's prime tenant — indeed, as the closest thing to professional football in town.

    But the school's rent is capped at a level that was set before its football program's recent return to national prominence, and some critics say that favorable lease terms have been shortchanging the Coliseum.

    A Times survey of stadium costs faced by other major universities has found that USC enjoys a marked financial advantage over other schools. What one Coliseum commissioner called USC's "sweet deal," and the university's efforts to extend it, may well entangle negotiations to bring the NFL back to Los Angeles.

    A majority of the Coliseum Commission, the joint state-county-city body that manages the state-owned facility, now believes that the only way to finance a major upgrade of the aging stadium is to turn over the Coliseum to the NFL. The idea is to make the NFL its prime tenant, with key design and operational authority over the property. In return, the league would pledge as much as $800 million in private funds for a state-of-the-art refurbishment.

    USC would become a subtenant of the NFL. However, the university has signaled its unhappiness with any deal that would give the NFL unqualified authority over the school's tenancy at the Coliseum, which currently seats 92,000.

    Although USC might benefit from playing in a modern Coliseum renovated with NFL money, it arguably has much to lose from a return of pro football to the stadium. Foremost is its highly advantageous lease.

    The current lease, which extends through the 2007 season, caps USC's rent per game at 8% of gross ticket revenue based on a maximum of 70,000 tickets sold. That has enabled USC to pocket nearly all the financial gain from a surge in attendance experienced from 2001 to 2005, during which its average home crowds rose nearly 60%, to 90,812 from 57,744.

    Meanwhile, USC has dodged a major expense faced by schools with stadiums on campus — upkeep and renovation. Over the last five years, many of the school's gridiron rivals have launched upgrades for campus facilities at prices ranging from $80 million to $226 million.

    The Coliseum hasn't had a major renovation since 1994, a seismic refurbishment largely financed by the federal government. Commission officials say renovations estimated at tens of millions of dollars, including the replacement of the scoreboards and all 92,000 seats, are badly overdue.

    "They have kind of a sweet deal," says David Israel, a television producer who is the school's most outspoken critic on the commission. "They're a private tax-exempt program playing in a taxpayer-financed stadium."

    USC argues that its record as the Coliseum's only permanent tenant since the stadium's opening in 1923 justifies special consideration. "Everyone else has come and gone," says Todd Dickey, USC's senior vice president for administration. "What would have happened to the place without us?"

    The list of fugitive pro football tenants includes the Rams, Raiders and Chargers. UCLA, which had played in the Coliseum since its opening, moved to the Rose Bowl after the 1981 season in a disagreement over the commission's negotiations with the then-incoming Raiders.

    Over the last 12 years, since the Raiders' later departure left Los Angeles without an NFL team, the league has played the Coliseum off against such other potential sites as the Rose Bowl, Anaheim and Carson. Last month, the NFL approved spending $10 million for design studies at the Coliseum and in Anaheim, which means the final choice of a location may not take place for months, if ever.

    A delegation of NFL executives is scheduled to meet today with Los Angeles city officials and local business leaders to gauge the extent of community support for a team. The visitors will meet with Orange County business leaders Thursday to discuss the Anaheim option.

    USC's discontent with the course of negotiations burst into the open May 22, when the university made public a letter from its president, Steven B. Sample, to the commission. Sample assailed a provision in a draft NFL lease that would require the league only to "attempt" to reach a mutually satisfactory sublease with the university.

    "This language would leave USC totally vulnerable because the NFL could dispatch with its obligation in a single and inconclusive meeting with us," he wrote. He asked the commission not to sign a lease with the NFL until USC reached its own "acceptable" deal with the league.

    He also sought assurances that the Coliseum would seat at least 80,000 for USC home games (NFL specifications call for about 68,000 seats for pro games), and that construction would not dislodge the school for more than two seasons.

    "If no deal can be reached between USC and the NFL," he wrote, "USC could be forced out of the Coliseum forever, with our athletic program reduced to shambles."

    Sample's letter, made public just before the NFL meeting at which the $10-million appropriation was approved, infuriated several commission members. "They wanted to interfere," Israel said. "They have a monopoly on football in L.A., and they think like capitalists and want to preserve their monopoly."

    County Supervisor Yvonne B. Burke, the commission's president, responded to Sample late last week, writing him that the commission was "very disappointed in the tone as well as the timing" of his letter.

    She said the Coliseum panel "would be more than happy to intervene" in the school's discussions with the NFL if USC requested but urged the university to "aggressively engage negotiations" on its own.

    The school's ability to block or force changes in a proposed NFL lease is uncertain, but it does have several potential weapons: its local popularity, a large corps of influential alumni in Southern California business and politics, and 10,000 campus parking spaces — roughly half the total available in the Coliseum neighborhood — that are crucial for game-day crowds.

    Although USC officials say they favor the NFL's return to the Coliseum, and NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue recently said he expects to have "a very strong partnership with USC" if the league returns to the stadium, supporters of an NFL deal may have to consider whether USC's concerns can be met without driving the NFL away.

    Commissioners noted that in 2004, USC had insisted on conducting its own negotiations with the league. "They said, 'We don't trust you not to sell us out,' " City Councilman Bernard C. Parks, the commission vice president, recalled last week.

    The university's new insistence that the commission help to protect its interests may reflect a recent change in local political opinion in favor of an NFL deal. In 2004, skepticism about the possibility of an NFL deal for the Coliseum ran high, not least because of the league's persistent flirtations with alternative sites.

    But local political leaders now express a strong desire to please the pro league. An NFL-friendly redevelopment proposal sped through the Los Angeles City Council on May 19 with unanimous approval and no debate. The once-contentious Coliseum Commission is virtually united in its determination to clear away all obstacles to the NFL's return — raising some alarm at USC.

    "As the NFL project has become more dominant in the body politic's mind, 'NFL über alles' has taken hold," says County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, the university's only outspoken supporter on the commission. Yaroslavsky argues that USC's downtown presence has benefited not only the Coliseum, but the entire Exposition Park neighborhood.

    "They deserve to be treated as a stakeholder. But they've been treated the way an unscrupulous landlord treats an elderly tenant," Yaroslavsky said.

    Other commissioners say they have bent over backward to treat USC fairly. The commission agreed to extend USC's lease terms, last set in 2001, virtually without alteration for 2006 and 2007 even though the football program's surge in popularity has filled university coffers. The school's total athletic revenue, including alumni and booster donations, rose to $60.7 million in fiscal 2004-05 from $38.3 million in 2000-01, according to federal disclosure reports. Revenue attributed directly to the football program rose to $29.3 million from $21.5 million in that period and the excess of revenue over expenses widened to $12.5 million from $10.5 million. These figures are expected to show another sharp increase for the current fiscal year, which includes the 2005 football season.

    Because very few major football schools play their home games in off-campus public stadiums, and fewer are private institutions as prominent and wealthy as USC, analogous arrangements elsewhere in the country are difficult to find.

    A Times comparison found USC's lease is more generous to the school than UCLA's lease at the Rose Bowl or the University of Miami's at the Orange Bowl.

    Last year, UCLA's home attendance at the Pasadena stadium averaged 64,217 and the school paid 8% of gross ticket sales. The lease fee is not subject to a cap. UCLA also pays 8% of all television revenue, turns over 40% to 60% of game-day advertising revenue and pays for its own ushers and ticket-takers.

    Miami pays 10% of gross ticket sales, with no cap. The university keeps its television revenue and pays the city 15% of its advertising revenue.

    By comparison, USC keeps all TV revenue as long as it exceeds a 70,000 ticket-per-game cap. The Trojan program also keeps all game-day ad revenue. USC splits the cost of ushers and ticket-takers with the Coliseum.

    USC receives no income from food and beverage sales at the Coliseum, while UCLA receives half of all net game-day concession income from the Rose Bowl, but that's not enough to make up for UCLA's other expenses.

    Experts familiar with both arrangements estimate USC might have paid 20% to 30% more in rent and revenue splits at the Coliseum last year if it were subject to UCLA's lease terms.

    Among other private universities playing in public facilities, the University of Pittsburgh is a subtenant of the NFL's Steelers at Heinz Field. Tulane University plays at the state-owned Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans for a flat-rate rent established in 1975. Neither school would disclose further details.

    It is likely that the terms of USC's lease will become stiffer, no matter how the NFL talks turn out. The commission's new 49-year lease of the Coliseum and adjacent Sports Arena from the state requires a renegotiation of its rent, currently $80,000 a year. The rent could rise to as much as $2.5 million under a contract formula.

    Any increase of more than 10% would, in turn, trigger a reopening of USC's lease for 2007 in which all terms would be on the table.

    "If there's no NFL deal going forward," Israel says, "it will be much more expensive for them to play in the Coliseum."
    Friday, August 11th, 2006
    11:26 am
    Let My Hair Down - Nelly Furtado
    Song's Lyrics >> N >> Nelly Furtado

    Title: Let My Hair Down
    Album: Loose
    Artist: Nelly Furtado

    I'm Nelly, I'm Nelly, I'm Nelly, I'm Nelly
    If you want the video
    I'm on your video
    If you want the radio
    I'm on your radio
    Call if you hear me, yo
    I'm Nelly, I'm Nelly, I'm Nelly, I'm Nelly

    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Bring me something that'll make me jump around

    Let's flow with this
    Let's get to know with this
    Let's hit the show with this
    Let's fly like a crow with this
    Do you wanna be my revue
    I could be your star even
    Or we could make a little haven
    Tell me what you're craving
    Let's make a dust bowl
    We'll hit it like Rose Bowl
    I do like sports
    But I don't like wearing shorts
    It's ok we could do it in the dark
    If you got a candle let's light a spark
    Everybody looks good in good lighting
    Hey we could do it quick and close our fighting

    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Bring me something that'll make me jump around
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Bring me something that'll make me jump around

    Smell it on the mic
    Feel alright
    And you can have a bite
    But not tonight
    You can call me Nico
    Give me something to eat, oh
    I heard you're chickety chic-o
    Like you're staying the week
    Yeah, you like my map
    Yeah, it's all that
    Let's start a frat
    Gimme gimme gimme phat
    You know you like vodka
    You like the way we rock ya
    Hey I'm your amore
    Come here when I call you something dolly

    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Bring me something that'll make me jump around
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Bring me something that'll make me jump around

    This is my flow (my hair down)
    Thsi is my flow (my hair down)
    [repeat]
    Jumpin' around
    This is my flow [repeat]
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Bring me something that'll make me jump around
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Baby I wanna let my hair down
    Bring me something that'll make me jump around

    Song's Lyrics >> N >> Nelly Furtado

    Songs of Nelly Furtado:

    album: "Whoa Nelly!" (2000)
    Whoa, Nelly!On The Radio (Remember The Days)Hey, Man - Nelly FurtadoBaby Girl - Nelly FurtadoI'm Like A Bird - Nelly FurtadoLegend - Nelly FurtadoTurn Off The Light - Nelly FurtadoParty - Nelly FurtadoTrynna Finda Way - Nelly FurtadoWell, Well - Nelly FurtadoI Will Make U Cry - Nelly FurtadoMy Love Grows Deeper Part 1 - Nelly FurtadoScared Of You - Nelly Furtadoalbum: "Folklore" (2003)
    FolkloreChildhood Dreams - Nelly FurtadoIsland Of Wonder - Nelly FurtadoBuild You Up - Nelly FurtadoPicture Perfect - Nelly FurtadoThe Grass Is Green - Nelly FurtadoSaturdays - Nelly FurtadoForca - Nelly FurtadoFresh Off The Boat - Nelly FurtadoExplode - Nelly FurtadoTry - Nelly FurtadoPowerless (Say What You Want) - Nelly Furtadoalbum: "Loose" (2006)
    LooseAfraid - Nelly FurtadoManeater - Nelly FurtadoPromiscuous - Nelly FurtadoGlow - Nelly FurtadoShowtime - Nelly FurtadoNo Hay Igual - Nelly FurtadoTe Busqué - Nelly FurtadoSay It Right - Nelly FurtadoDo It - Nelly FurtadoIn God's Hands - Nelly FurtadoWait For You - Nelly FurtadoAll Good Things (Come To An End)Let My Hair Down - Nelly FurtadoSomebody To Love - Nelly FurtadoTag: Lyrics
    Thursday, August 3rd, 2006
    6:20 pm
    Make it an even dozen?
    During the dog days of summer, college football fans often debate various football-related topics on message boards. For Big Ten fans, the most prevalent topic of the past few years has been whether the Big Ten should add a 12th team in order to create 2 even Divisions with a Conference Championship Game. Let’s not talk about which school should be added. Let’s just focus on the pros and cons of adding another team and creating a 2-Division football conference with a Championship Game. These are my main thoughts, in no particular order, but there are probably hundreds of (better) ideas out there. Feel free to comment, if the spirit moves you…

    Pros to adding a 12th team and having a Conference Championship Game:

    -Greater exposure- Does the Big Ten really need more exposure? They just announced they’re starting their own TV network, and they have a long-term coverage deal with ABC/ESPN – probably the most influential/pervasive TV group in terms of sports coverage. Increasing your audience is always nice, but how much can/will that audience increase? It’s not like people in New York City don’t watch the Big Ten, or that they will all start watching our games if we add Syracuse. Adding a powerhouse like Notre Dame would have a big impact, but would adding a team like Pitt or Missouri really do anything for the league? I just hope that if/when the Big Ten does expand, they have done some serious market research on this, because I don’t think it will make much of a difference.

    -Eliminates the potential for another “2002 scenario”- Probably the biggest black eye for the Big Ten occurred in 2002, when both Iowa and Ohio State went undefeated in conference play, and (obviously) didn’t play each other. While Iowa did have a non-conference loss at Iowa State, all of the talking heads on ESPN were freaking out about this, and ripping the Big Ten for its awkward scheduling setup. Adding another team would eliminate the possibility of 2 undefeated teams in the same conference, but other problems will arise (see discussion at the bottom of this post).

    -Less confusion and no stupid tiebreakers- With its current scheduling setup, there are so many ridiculous tiebreakers and odd rules that could be eliminated with the implementation of a Championship Game. How ridiculous is it when a co-champion can get to the Rose Bowl just because the other co-champ went more recently? Let me answer for you – it’s ridiculously ridiculous!! A Championship Game would make things much easier to understand, but would not necessarily lead to a perfect scheduling system (see discussion at the bottom of this post).

    Cons to adding a 12th team and having a Conference Championship Game:

    -How to divide the Divisions?- Creating 2 equal Divisions might not be a nightmare, but it wouldn’t necessarily be easy. Over the past 5 years or so, I’ve seen numerous Division possibilities bandied about on message boards – some sounded great, others seemed a bit off. But since this is a Michigan blog, I must mention the one key dilemma (in my opinion) – What do you do with Michigan and Ohio State? How will this affect the greatest rivalry in the sport (or all sports)? Let’s take a more in-depth look at this sub-issue:

    Option #1: Placing Michigan and Ohio State in the same Division:
    You would have to assume that under this scenario, The Game would, more often than not, be for the Division crown. But would this be good for the rivalry? If we knew the winner of The Game was gonna have to play Iowa the next weekend in the Championship Game, would it still be as exciting? Would the winner of The Game be motivated in the Championship Game, or would they be emotionally drained? Would it be fair to put the 2 best teams in Big Ten history in the same 6-team Division? Lots of factors to consider here.

    Option #2: Placing Michigan and Ohio State in different Divisions, but having them play every year in the regular season finale:
    Back-to-back games against OSU? This could very well happen many times if this was the setup. Playing OSU twice in the span of a few weeks just doesn’t seem right to me. I also think it would potentially deprive the fans of a good game in the first matchup. Think about this: If both Michigan and OSU head into The (first) Game having already wrapped up their respective Divisions, would they really be going all out? Maybe if one or both were undefeated… but otherwise you would think that both teams might “save something” (including players) for the Championship Game.

    Option #3: Placing Michigan and Ohio State in different Divisions, and having them play every year earlier on in the season:
    Some younger fans seem to be intrigued by the idea of a Miami-FSU type of thing, whereby Michigan and Ohio State would play to open the season, and possibly meet again in the Big Ten Championship Game. Traditionalists are disgusted by this idea. I think I’m more of a traditionalist on this one. Even having The Game on “the 3rd Saturday in October” or something like that would diminish its importance (to me, at least).

    Option #4: Placing Michigan and Ohio State in different Divisions, but not “protecting” the rivalry, meaning they won’t play in some years:
    Earth stops rotating. Not gonna happen.

    I just don't think there is a scenario here that will please everybody. In fact, many of these scenarios won't please anybody. Options 1 and 2 seem to be the most "likely," but I'm not too sure how I feel about those yet. More thinking to do...

    -Less chance of sending 2 teams to BCS Bowls- The Big Ten is sitting pretty right now. By not having a championship game, it can send more high profile teams (Michigan, OSU, PSU, Iowa, Wisconsin, etc.) to Bowl games with a win in their last regular season game. This dramatically increases their appeal to the Bowls, and gives the Big Ten a great chance at having 2 BCS teams many years.

    -More scheduling flaws- A Championship Game does not solve all of your problems. The media has mocked the Big Ten for failing to have a Championship Game. But they are missing a key issue, and giving the 12-team-and-larger leagues a free pass on a very important point: Teams from larger leagues with Championship Games still don’t play every other team in their conference. In fact, “good” teams often miss out on playing other “good” teams due to scheduling differences between the Divisions in the Conference. So it’s not only the Conference that is flawed, but also the way in which Division champions are determined! Since these 12-team leagues do not have “equal” schedules for each team in each respective Division, there have been plenty of times in the past when, say, a Kansas State has missed a “good” team like an Oklahoma (since they weren’t on their schedule), and didn’t even have to play said team in the Championship Game because, while “good,” said team was not good enough to win its Division. And it impacts everybody – even teams that don’t make it to the Championship Game. Did you know that Florida hasn’t played Auburn the past 2 seasons? I bet a lot of casual fans think they have, simply because they’re both in the SEC. The bottom line is this: Any conference that does not play a round-robin schedule is inherently flawed. Playing a Conference Championship Game might give the media and some fans a sense of “fairness” or “closure” or whatever you want to call it. But if the way each team gets to that Championship Game is flawed, and if each team doesn’t play (at least) 3 other conference teams, then have we really made any progress over the current Big Ten system?
    Monday, July 31st, 2006
    10:19 pm
    Um
    Look here.

    If you don't want to, I'll show you:

    "In a video segment on 'Oprah,' Mack Brown revealed that McConaughey ('93) said that the Rose Bowl win was 'much better than winning an Oscar.'"

    Matthew McConaughey didn't win any Oscars.

    Just wanted to point that out.
    Saturday, July 29th, 2006
    5:10 pm
    Two Clubs
    I joined that dandy little health club I mentioned a few posts back. There's nothing like showing up at 1:00 PM and getting your pick of machines. Flat screen TVs show ESPN, CNN, and reruns of "Charmed." Lots of pouty, cute girl witch looks. But it's exerting a strange fascination on me. I grow irritable around 1:00 PM on days when I'm not at the health club. And somehow, turning on "Charmed" at home wouldn't be the same.

    More on this.

    In addition, I joined the Rose Bowl Aquatic Club. Usually around 12:45 - 1:00 PM is the best time to go aqua run. My head is lathered up with sun block. Sometimes there are "swimming moms" hectoring their children. One woman harangued her two daughers non-stop for over 40 minutes, berating them for bad diving form, encouraging them to do "one more" after four or five "last one and we'll go." What fascinated me was she never paused to inhale. With lung capacity like that, she should be doing deep ocean salvage minus the dive suit.

    But I gradually grow stronger in the water.

    There's nothing like being tanned, fit, and unemployed.

    It's the Hollywood way.
    Thursday, July 27th, 2006
    11:13 am
    Tulle
    You guys, you guys! I found my wedding dress!


    Can I afford it? No. Am I getting married? No! But lookit! It's my wedding dress! Princessy sleeves! Long twirly skirt! No tags! Or collars! I've refused jobs because the uniform was a polo shirt! My priorities are completely and totally in order!

    I am what you might charitably call "un-tall," and finding the proper dress is vital. Too much froo-froo and I will appear as a tulle-encrusted Rose Bowl float as I make my way down the aisle. This was the problem with Charles and Di; by the time she hauled her Kansas-sized train up to the altar, she was exhausted and there was nothing left to fight off Camilla. The woman simply didn't think. How was she going to bustle all that mess? How was she supposed to dance to "Everybody Have Fun Tonight" at the reception hall in that thing?

    See, wedding dress selection is very, very important for single women. We may not have a fiance, or a boyfriend, or a male-named topical storm in the area, even. But we do have a tiara on backorder. I also have the table themes, color of the bridesmaids dresses, location of registries, and first-song choice done. Still undecided on the bouquets; they will have to match the boutonniere, so perhaps the groom will have say in that. Whoever he is. Not really important.

    what about the d.j. at: mb@blondechampagne.com
About LiveJournal.com

Advertisement